New Release: Agents API Run Blackbox CLI, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI and more agents on remote VMs powered by @vercel sandboxes with 1 single api implementation https://t.co/2XNRGHtAQA

The future of enterprise software

Multi-agent UI's will be huge in 2026. Some early signs: A2UI, AG-UI, Vercel AI JSON UI https://t.co/oXfGOG92T6

There's a dude on YouTube, a vibe coder. He does hardcore streams and he does it for 6 hours a day with one goal in mind: to vibe code an app to a million dollars. The way he opens up 6 terminals with Claude Code running on all of them is too good. I hope he makes it. https://t.co/7NYwrf7awQ

We've been working on something internally called "infinite sessions".  When you're in a long session, repeated compactions result in non-sense. People work around this in lots of ways. Usually temporary markdown files in the repo that the LLM can update - the downside being that in team settings you have to juggle these artifacts as they can't be included in PR. Infinite sessions solves all of this. One context window that you never have to worry about clearing, and an agent that can track the endless thread of decisions.

This guy just exposed real computer science problem https://t.co/t58NeciOJW

Claude Code idea: Smart fork detection. Have every session transcript auto loaded into a vector database via RAG. Create a /detect-fork command. Invoking this command will first prompt Claude to ask you what you're wanting to do. You tell it, and then it will dispatch a sub-agent to the RAG database to find the chat session with the most relevant context to what you're trying to achieve. It will then output the fork session command for that session. Paste it in a new terminal, and seamlessly pick up where you left off.

men will go on a claude code weekend bender and have nothing to show for it but a "more optimized claude setup"

Something is cooking in GitHub #copilot https://t.co/WZKoXGsGqA

To restate the argument in more obvious terms. The eventual end state of labor under automation has been understood by smart men (ie not shallow libshits) for ≈160 years since Darwin Among the Machines. The timeline to full automation was unclear. Technocrats and some Marxists expected it in the 20th century. The last 14 years in AI (since connectionism won the hardware lottery as evidenced by AlexNet) match models that predict post-labor economy by 2035-2045. Vinge, Legg, Kurzweil, Moravec and others were unclear on details but it's obvious that if you showed them the present snapshot in say 1999, they'd have said «wow, yep, this is the endgame, almost all HARD puzzle pieces are placed». The current technological stack is almost certainly not the final one. That doesn't matter. It will clearly suffice to build everything needed for a rapid transition to the next one – data, software, hardware, and it looks extremely dubious that the final human-made stack will be paradigmatically much more complex than what we've done in these 14 years. Post-labor economy = post-consumer market = permanent underclass for virtually everyone and state-oligarchic power centralization by default. As an aside: «AI takeover» as an alternative scenario is cope for nihilists and red herring for autistic quokkas. Optimizing for compliance will be easier and ultimately more incentivized than optimizing for novel cognitive work. There will be a decidedly simian ruling class, though it may choose to *become* something else. But that's not our business anon. We won't have much business at all. The serious business will be about the technocapital deepening and gradually expanding beyond Earth. Frantic attempts to «escape the permanent underclass» in this community are not so much about getting rich as about converting wealth into some equity, a permanent stake in the ballooning posthuman economy, large enough that you'd at least be treading water on dividends, in the best case – large enough that it can sustain a thin, disciplined bloodline in perpetuity. Current datacenter buildup effects and PC hardware prices are suggestive of where it's going. Consumers are getting priced out of everything valuable for industrial production, starting from the top (microchips) and the bottom (raw inputs like copper and electricity). The two shockwaves will be traveling closer to the middle. This is not so much a "supercycle" as a secular trend. American resource frenzy and disregard for diplomacy can be interpreted as a state-level reaction to this understanding. There certainly are other factors, hedges for longer timelines, institutional inertia and disagreement between actors that prevents truly desperate focus on the new paradigm. But the smart people near the levers of power in the US do think in these terms. Speaking purely of the political instinct, I think the quality of US elite is very high, and they're ahead of the curve, thus there are even different American cliques who have coherent positions on the issue. Other global elites, including the Chinese one, are slower on the uptake. But this state of affairs isn't as permanent as the underclass will be. For people who are not BOTH extremely smart and agentic – myself included – I don't have a solution that doesn't sound hopelessly romantic and naive.